Corvin Bolden v. Officer Mark Beaupre
Opinion
After a jury rendered a verdict for defendants on Corvin Jerrod Bolden’s 42 U.S.C. § 1988 complaint, he moved for post-judgment relief, arguing that the district court’s 1 excessive-force instruction was erroneous. The district court denied his motion and Bolden appeals.
After careful review, this court concludes that the instruction fairly and adequately represents the evidence and the applicable law. See Campos v. City of Blue Springs, Mo., 289 F.3d 546, 551-52 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review). This court affirms the judgment and denies the pending motion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
1
. The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Corvin Jerrod BOLDEN I, Appellant, v. Officer Mark BEAUPRE, in His Individual Capacity; Officer Kristin Sturgis, in Her Individual Capacity; Officer John Engle, in His Individual Capacity; City of Minneapolis, as Employer; Nurse Donna Doe, in Her Individual Capacity, Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished