Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2011

Coleman v. Commissioner

Coleman v. Commissioner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided July 19, 2011 · Murphy, Arnold, Benton
420 F. App'x 663

Counsel

Larry Delano Coleman, Kansas City, MO, pro se., Thomas J. Clark, John A. Dicicco, Richard Farber, Robert William Metzler, Supervisory, Curtis Clarence Pett, Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Deputy, U.S. Department of Justice, William Wilkins, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, DC, Dennis Onnen, U.S. Internal Revenue Service, Kansas City, MO, for Appellee.

Coleman v. Commissioner

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

*664 PER CURIAM.

Larry Coleman appeals the tax court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his action challenging a Notice of Determination issued by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Office of Appeals.

After carefully reviewing the record de novo, see Nestle Purina Petcare Co. v. Comm’r, 594 F.3d 968, 969 (8th Cir.), cert. denied — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 86, 178 L.Ed.2d 241 (2010), we conclude that summary judgment was appropriate for the reasons stated by the tax court, and we find no merit to Coleman’s arguments on appeal. We also decline to consider Coleman’s request for relief based on changed circumstances. See 26 U.S.C. § 6330(d)(2) (IRS Office of Appeals shall retain jurisdiction with respect to determination, including subsequent hearings, on issues regarding change in circumstances which affects such determination).

Accordingly, we affirm the tax court’s decision. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Robert N. Armen, Jr., United States Tax Court Judge.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.