Albert Richardson v. T. Outlaw
Opinion
Federal inmate Albert Richardson appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We deny his motion for appointment of counsel, and we conclude that habeas relief was not warranted for the reasons relied upon by the district court, see Hill v. Morrison, 349 F.3d 1089, 1091 (8th Cir. 2003) (standard of review). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
1
. The Honorable J. Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Albert A. RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. T.C. OUTLAW, Warden, FCI-Forrest City, Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished