Alfredo Flores-Silva pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute at least 500 grams of a mixture and substance containing methamphetamine and at least 50 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A). The district court 1 sentenced him to 108 months in prison and 5 years of supervised release. On appeal, Flores-Silva’s counsel *516 moves to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), suggesting that the sentence is excessive.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court, in sentencing Flores-Silva, committed no procedural error and imposed a substantively reasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (in reviewing sentences, appellate court first ensures that no significant procedural error occurred, then considers substantive reasonableness of sentence under abuse-of-discretion standard, taking into account totality of circumstances; if sentence is within Guidelines range, appellate court may apply presumption of reasonableness). Further, having reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfriv-olous issues for appeal.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.