U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Flores

United States v. Flores
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided December 16, 2011 · Wollman, Murphy, Benton
663 F.3d 1022; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24976; 2011 WL 6266033 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Flores

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joaquin Bravo Flores was indicted on a charge of being an illegal alien in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. *1023 §§ 922(g)(5)(A) and 924(a)(2). Flores moved to dismiss the indictment, arguing that § 922(g)(5)(A) was facially unconstitutional in light of District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 128 S.Ct. 2783, 171 L.Ed.2d 637 (2008). The district court 1 denied the motion, and Flores appeals. Agreeing with the Fifth Circuit that the protections of the Second Amendment do not extend to aliens illegally present in this country, United States v. Portillo-Munoz, 643 F.3d 437 (5th Cir. 2011), petition for cert. filed (U.S. Nov. 2, 2011) (No. 11-7200), we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.