Streambend Properties II, LLC and Streambend Properties VIII, LLC appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action for failure to state a claim. The court concluded that plaintiffs failed to sufficiently plead the interstate-commerce element of the claims brought under the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq. After careful de novo review, see Owen v. Gen. Motors Corp., 533 F.3d 913, 918 (8th Cir. 2008), we find that paragraphs 46 and 47 of the complaint sufficiently pleaded this element. See Fed.R.CivJP. 8(a); Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949-50, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009); Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-57, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007). The complaint alleges that the defendants “made use ... of the mails” and made false representations “by ... letters.” Given that Rule 8(a)(2) requires only “a short and plain statement of the claim,” and that “[s]pecifie facts are not necessary,” Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93, 127 S.Ct. 2197, 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007) (per curiam), these statements were sufficient to allege “use ... of the mails” as required by 15 U.S.C. § 1703(a). Accordingly, we reverse the dismissal of the Interstate *628 Land Sales Full Disclosure Act claims in Counts 1 and 2 of the complaint, and we remand to the district court for further proceedings.