Leticia Sanders, on behalf of her minor daughter D.S.H., appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of supplemental security income benefits. Upon de novo review, see Moore ex rel. Moore v. Barnhart, 413 F.3d 718, 721 (8th Cir. 2005), we agree with the district court’s reasons for rejecting the arguments Sanders raised below, and we decline to consider the new contentions she raises on appeal, see Flynn v. Chater, 107 F.3d 617, 620 (8th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.