In this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Michael Woolman appeals the district court’s 1 preservice dismissal of his complaint without prejudice. Upon careful de novo review, we find no basis for reversal. See Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (standard of review); see also Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004) (while pro se complaint should be liberally construed, it still must allege facts to support claims advanced; court will not supply facts or construct legal theory for plaintiff).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cm. R. 47B. We also deny Woolman’s pending motion to compel discovery.