Donna Holliday appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Following de novo review, see Perkins v. Astrue, 648 F.3d 892, 897 (8th Cir. 2011), this court concludes that the administrative law judge provided adequate reasons for giving little weight to certain findings of the claimant’s treating physicians, and for discrediting the claimant’s subjective complaints to the extent alleged; and that substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the denial of benefits. This court affirms. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.