Christopher Baldwin v. Harley Davidson Motor Co.
Opinion
In this action claiming employment-related discrimination and retaliation, Christopher Baldwin appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment. Upon careful de novo review, see Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031, 1042 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 513, 181 L.Ed.2d 349 (2011), we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Baldwin’s pending motion.
1
. The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Christopher BALDWIN, Appellant, v. HARLEY DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY GROUP, INC., Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished