In this interpleader action, Reginald Bailey appeals the district court’s 1 adverse summary judgment decision. Following careful de novo review, see Stein v. Chase Home Fin., LLC, 662 F.3d 976, 979 (8th Cir. 2011) (standard of review), we conclude that the summary judgment decision was appropriate for the reasons stated by the district court. We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to impose sanctions, see MHC Inv. Co. v. Racom Corp., 323 F.3d 620, 624 (8th Cir. 2003) (standard of review), or in denying reconsideration, see Arnold, v. Wood, 238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.