Jermaine Arrington appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence-reduction motion based on the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (FSA). We conclude that Arrington was not entitled to a reduction, as his Guidelines sentencing range was calculated based on his unlawful possession of a firearm, see U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1, which was not affected by any provision of the FSA. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (court may reduce prison term of defendant who has been sentenced based on sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by Sentencing Commission); United States v. Tolliver, 570 F.3d 1062, 1066-67 (8th Cir. 2009) (§ 3582(c)(2) allows sentence reduction only when amendment lowers applicable Guidelines range).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.