Richard Hart appeals the district court’s 1 adverse judgment following a bench trial in his Federal Tort Claims Act lawsuit. We decline to consider Hart’s sole argument for reversal as it is based on an issue not raised below, and it does not fall under the recognized exceptions for entertaining new arguments. See Henning v. Mainstreet Bank, 538 F.3d 975, 979 (8th Cir. 2008). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.