Dason Melius v. Lindsay Burke

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Dason Melius v. Lindsay Burke, 539 F. App'x 697 (8th Cir. 2013)

Dason Melius v. Lindsay Burke

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Iowa inmate Dason Melius appeals the district court’s 1 preservice 28 U.S.C. § 1915A dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against four individuals employed at Iowa’s Newton Correctional Facility. Upon careful de novo review, we conclude that the dismissal was proper, because we agree with the district court that Melius failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (in civil action by prisoner for redress from governmental entity or officer or employee thereof, court shall dismiss complaint if court determines action fails to state claim); see also Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (de novo review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

Reference

Full Case Name
Dason Boise MELIUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lindsay BURKE; Katherine Kerr; Gerald Jones; Terry Mapes, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished