Matt McDermott directly appeals the order of the district court 1 modifying the terms of his probation. Upon careful review, we reject McDermott’s claim that the district court was biased against him and conclude that his other arguments on appeal lack merit. The district court committed no abuse of discretion. Cf. United States v. Leigh, 276 F.3d 1011, 1012 (8th Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (revocation of probation is reviewed for abuse of discretion and requires only enough evidence, within sound judicial discretion, to satisfy district judge that conduct of probationer has not met conditions of probation). 2

We thus affirm the order of the district court. We also deny McDermott’s pending motion.