Rhonda Golden appeals the district court’s 1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of her complaint. After careful de novo review, see Palmer v. Ill. Farmers Ins. Co., 666 F.3d 1081, 1083 (8th Cir. 2012), we conclude that the dismissal was proper because Golden’s complaint did not allege sufficient facts to support any of her claims, see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, that states facially plausible claim for relief). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.