Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Oakes v. Howell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Oakes v. Howell, 547 F. App'x 808 (8th Cir. 2013)
Bowman, Gruender, Loken

Oakes v. Howell

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Phillip Oakes appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for damages, asserting a claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. After careful de novo review, see Sutherland v. Mo. Dep’t of Corr., 580 F.3d 748, 750 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review), we find no basis for reversal, and accordingly we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.

. The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Joe J. Volpe, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Reference

Full Case Name
Phillip J. OAKES v. Kaye HOWELL, Warden, Randall Williams Correctional Facility, Arkansas Department of Correction Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction Wendy Kelley, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction George Wilson, Director, Corizon Inc. Judith Savoy, Director of Nurses, Corizon Inc.
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published
↑