Clarence McCann v. New World Pasta Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Clarence McCann v. New World Pasta Company, 501 F. App'x 600 (8th Cir. 2013)
Melloy, Per Curiam, Shepherd, Wollman

Clarence McCann v. New World Pasta Company

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Clarence McCann appeals the district court’s 1 orders granting summary judgment to New World Pasta Company and denying McCann appointment of counsel. New World Pasta Company moves to strike certain new evidence that McCann has submitted on appeal, and we grant the motion. Having carefully reviewed the record that was before the district court, see Estate of Morgan v. Cook, 686 F.3d 494, 496 (8th Cir. 2012) (de novo review), we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons explained in the court’s thorough memorandum and order. We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appointment of counsel. See Phillips v. Jasper Cnty. Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Reference

Full Case Name
Clarence McCANN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. NEW WORLD PASTA COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Status
Unpublished