After Orlando Straw admitted violating his release conditions, the district court 1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to 9 months in prison with no supervision to follow. Straw appeals, arguing that his sentence is unreasonable and that the court improperly weighed the sentencing factors. We disagree. The record shows that the district court properly considered the relevant sentencing factors before imposing a revocation sentence that was authorized by statute and within the applicable Guidelines range. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), 3583(e)(3); United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009) (applying presumption of substantive reasonableness to revocation sentence within Guidelines range); United States v. White Face, 383 F.3d 733, 740 (8th Cir. 2004) (court need not list every § 3553(a) factor when sentencing defendant upon revocation of supervised release).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We also grant counsel leave to withdraw, subject to counsel informing Shaw about procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certio-rari.