Phillip Williams appeals the district court’s dismissal of his habeas corpus petition as untimely. The issue before this Court is whether the district court properly determined that Williams is not entitled to equitable tolling. However, this issue is now moot after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in McQuiggin v. Perkins, No. 12-126, 569 U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1924, - L.Ed.2d - (2013), as Williams asserted newly discovered evidence of actual innocence as the primary ground for his petition. Therefore, we remand to the district court for a determination as to whether Williams’s new evidence meets the “demanding” actual-innocence standard. 2 Id. at -, 133 S.Ct. 1924.