Inez Hunter appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of her complaint raising a variety *509 of housing-discrimination and state-law claims. Upon careful de novo review, see Saterdalen v. Spencer, 725 F.3d 838, 840-41 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review), we conclude the district court properly dismissed the complaint for the reasons explained in the thorough report and recommendation that the court adopted.

Accordingly, we deny Hunter’s pending motions and we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.