Lennie R. Senter appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Title VII action against his former employer, Stericycle, Inc. (Stericy-cle). Upon de novo review, we agree with the district court that Stericycle met its burden of showing that there were no gen *274 uine issues of material fact, and that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Senter’s claims that he was subjected to racial harassment and discrimination, and that he suffered retaliation in violation of Title VIL See Whisenhunt v. Sw. Bell Tel., 573 F.3d 565, 568 (8th Cir. 2009). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.