Federal inmate Auzio Hewlett appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). Upon de novo review, see Sisney v. Reisch, 674 F.3d 839, 843 (8th Cir. 2012), we find that there was no record support for Hewlett’s *583 constitutional claims, see Scheffler v. Molin, 743 F.3d 619, 620-21 (8th Cir. 2014) (when qualified-immunity defense is asserted, this court evaluates both whether defendant violated plaintiffs constitutional rights and whether those rights were clearly established; if there is no constitutional violation, however, this court need not proceed further). We also find no merit to Hewlett’s arguments for reversal. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.