Donald Copley appeals after the district court 1 dismissed his civil action, and denied his post-judgment motion. 2 We deny Copley’s pending motions for a transcript and a change of venue; and following our careful review of the record before us, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the post-judgment motion, because Copley did not present circumstances justifying relief. See In re Guidant Corp. Implantable Defibrillators Prod. Liab. Litig., 496 F.3d 863, 866 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.