In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Arkansas inmate Donald Winnett appeals after the district court 1 adversely disposed of all of his claims. Upon careful de novo review, we conclude that no error occurred. See Joseph v. Allen, 712 F.3d 1222, 1225 (8th Cir. 2013) (this court reviews district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, viewing all evidence and drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of nonmov-ing party; summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and moving party is entitled to judgment as matter of law); Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (preservice dismissals are reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Win-nett’s motion for appointed counsel.