United States v. Dwayne Appling
United States v. Dwayne Appling
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 14-1456 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Dwayne Appling
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, Waterloo ____________
Submitted: October 14, 2014 Filed: October 20, 2014 [Unpublished] ____________
Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Dwayne Appling directly appeals the sentences imposed by the district court1 after he pleaded guilty to drug offenses. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing the sentences are unreasonable.
After careful review, we conclude that Appling’s within-Guidelines-range sentences are not unreasonable. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (appellate review of sentencing decision). Also, having independently reviewed the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished