[Unpublished]

Matthew T. White appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of child’s insurance benefits. Upon de novo review, we conclude that the administra *605 tive law judge’s (ALJ’s) opinion is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, including new evidence the Appeals Council considered. See Davidson v. Astrue, 501 F.3d 987, 989-90 (8th Cir. 2007). Specifically, we find no validity to the challenges White raises to the ALJ’s determination of his residual functional capacity (RFC). See Eichelberger v. Barnhart, 390 F.3d 584, 591 (8th Cir. 2004) (claimant has burden of establishing RFC; factors in RFC determination). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.