Kallys Albert, Sr., appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judg *256 ment in his action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Upon de novo review of the record, see Silva v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 762 F.3d 711, 718 (8th Cir. 2014), we agree with the district court that Albert failed to meet his burden of designating specific facts creating triable questions of fact, see Crossley v. Ga.-Pac. Corp., 355 F.3d 1112, 1113-14 (8th Cir. 2004) (per curiam). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.