Chad William Lensing appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. For reversal, Lensing raises claims regarding the administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) failure to develop the record, the ALJ’s findings on what constituted severe impairments, the credibility assessments made, and the lack of weight that the ALJ gave to medical source statements and restrictions that were noted by treating mental health care providers. Following a careful and thorough review of the record, we conclude that the ALJ’s determination is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, that Lensing’s arguments do not support reversal, and that an extended discussion is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.