U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2014

Waldner v. North American Truck & Trailer, Inc.

Waldner v. North American Truck & Trailer, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided December 5, 2014 · Bowman, Colloton, Smith
586 F. App'x 249

Counsel

Roger Waldner, Yankton, SD, pro se., william Fuller, Hilary Lynn Williamson, Fuller & Williamson, Cesar A. Juarez, Jeffrey L. Bratkiewicz, Kathryn J. Hoskins, Siegel & Barnett, Paul Henry Linde, Michael John Schaffer, Schaffer Law Office, Jason Robert-Feil Sutton, Thomas J. Welk, Meghan K. Woster, Vince Roche, Davenport & Evans, Michael L. Luce, Murphy & Goldammer, Roger Damgaard, Sander J. Morehead, Justin G. Smith, Blayne Hagen, James Ellis Moore, Woods & Fuller, Lee A. Magnuson, Lindquist & Vennum, Eric Kerkvliet, Dana Van Beek Palmer, Lynn & Jackson, Robert L. Mea-dors Brende & Schroeder Sioux Falls, SD, Peter A. Koller, Moss & Barnett, Minneapolis, MN, Robert C. Riter, Jr. Riter & Rogers, Pierre, SD, Thomas Peyton Johnson, Ann Tuxbury Lebeck, Davis & Graham, Denver, CO, for Defendants-Appe-lees., Karen Snow, Beresford, SD, pro se., Action Carrier, Inc., Watertown, SD, pro se., Michael L. Walsh, Watertown, SD, pro se., Wendy L. Walsh, Watertown, SD, pro se., Scott Donald Wiele, pro se., Donald Webb, Michigan City, IN, pro se., Mark Thomas Geis, Eau Claire, WI, pro se., Timothy Mueller, Dubuque, IA, pro se.

Waldner v. North American Truck & Trailer, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Roger Waldner appeals from the adverse judgment of the District Court1 in his action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) entered after the court granted defendants’ various motions and dismissed sua sponte the few remaining claims. Upon careful consideration of the issues Waldner raises on appeal,2 we find no basis for reversal. *251The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

. The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.

. Waldner has dropped his appeal from orders disposing of his claims against some defendants, and we decline to consider claims that he has waived by not including any meaningful arguments on appeal. See Williams v. Decker, 767 F.3d 734, 743 n. 3 (8th Cir. 2014).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.