Janice Emerson appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of judgment on the pleadings in her pro se diversity action against The James F. Lincoln Arc Welding Foundation and Lincoln Electric Company. *523 Upon careful de novo review, we conclude that Emerson’s complaint was time-barred, and that her arguments on appeal are unavailing. See Ashley Cnty., Ark. v. Pfizer, Inc., 552 F.3d 659, 665 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. As to the motions filed by the parties in this court, we grant appellees’ motion to seal documents to the extent the clerk’s office determines that any documents are governed by Eighth Circuit Rule 25A(h) or Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, and we deny all pending motions in all other respects.