Reginald Clemons v. Daniel Dicus
Opinion
Missouri inmate Reginald Clemons appeals following entry of final judgment by the' district court 1 in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Clemons’s arguments for reversal, we conclude that, for the reasons expressed in the district court’s relevant orders, the court (1) properly dismissed, for failure to state a claim, Clemons’s claim regarding telephone calls; (2) properly granted summary judgment on his retaliation claim; and (3) did not abuse its broad discretion in denying in-junctive relief, and in refusing to compel additional discovery. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Reginald CLEMONS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. George LOMBARDI, MDOC Director, Individual Capacity; John/Jane Doe, General Counsel, Individual Capacity; Troy Steele, Warden, PCC, Individual Capacity; Brenda Ross, Litigation Officer, Individual Capacity; Douglas Nickelson, Phone Monitor, Individual Capacity; Timothy Lancaster, Investigator, Individual Capacity, Defendants Daniel Dicus, Correctional Officer, Individual Capacity; Jeff Harper, Correctional Officer, Individual Capacity; Thomas Collins, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Individual Capacity, Defendants-Appellees John/Jane Doe, Functional Unit Manager, Individual Capacity; Christine Henson, Correctional Officer, Individual Capacity; Matt Briesacher, Defendants
- Status
- Unpublished