Wilson v. Arkansas Department of Correction

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Wilson v. Arkansas Department of Correction, 600 F. App'x 1013 (8th Cir. 2015)
Bowman, Kelly, Loken, Per Curiam

Wilson v. Arkansas Department of Correction

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Charles Wilson brought an action claiming that conditions at the Cummins Unit of the Arkansas Department of Correction did not comply with relevant safety standards. The district court 2 denied preliminary injunctive relief, and this interlocutory appeal followed. After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion, for the reasons discussed by the court in its opinion. See Dataphase Sys., Inc. v. C L Sys., Inc., 640 F.2d 109, 113 (8th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

2

. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Reference

Full Case Name
Charles Isaac WILSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant Does, All Other Inmates Similarly Situated, Plaintiff v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Defendant Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections; State Fire Marshall, Defendants-Appellees State of Arkansas, Defendant
Status
Unpublished