U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2015

Detrick Lockridge v. Per Mar Security & Research

Detrick Lockridge v. Per Mar Security & Research
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided May 13, 2015 · Colloton, Bye, Shepherd
603 F. App'x 522

Counsel

Detrick Lockridge, Minneapolis, MN, pro se., James Brendan Sherman, Chad Alan Staul, Wessels & Sherman, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellee.

Detrick Lockridge v. Per Mar Security & Research

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Detrick Lockridge appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his action against his former employer, in which he asserted claims of unlawful discrimination and retaliation. Upon careful de novo review, we conclude that the district court’s decision was correct. See Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031, 1042-43 (8th Cir. 2011) (en *523 banc) (standard of review); see also Moody v. Vozel, 771 F.3d 1093, 1097 (8th Cir. 2014) (discussing standards applicable to claim of discriminatory termination), petition for cert. filed, — U.S.L.W. - (U.S. Apr. 23, 2015) (No. 14-1271); Alvarez v. Des Moines Bolt Supply, Inc., 626 F.3d 410, 416-18 (8th Cir. 2010) (discussing standards applicable to claim of unlawful retaliation).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Michael J. Davis, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.