In this action removed from state court to federal court, Nicholas Weimer appeals after the district court 1 denied his motion for leave to amend his complaint, granted a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and ruled adversely on cross-motions for summary judgment. After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Harris v. FedEx Nat’l LTL, Inc., 760 F.3d 780, 786 (8th Cir. 2014) (denial of leave to amend is reviewed for abuse of discretion); Rochling v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 725 F.3d 927, 930 (8th Cir. 2013) (dismissal for failure to state claim is reviewed de novo); Humphries v. Pulaski Cnty. Special Sch. Dist., 580 F.3d 688, 692 (8th Cir. 2009) (decision on cross-motions for summary judgment is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.