Koatha Perry Broadus appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of supplemental security income. Upon care-' ful consideration of Broadus’s challenges to the residual functional capacity (RFC) determination, and de novo review of the record, we agree with the district court that the administrative law judge’s determination that Broadus is not disabled is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. See Lott v. Colvin, 772 F.3d 546, 548-49 (8th Cir. 2014); see also Myers v. Colvin, 721 F.3d 521, 527 (8th Cir. 2013) (considerations in RFC determination); Martise v. Astrue, 641 F.3d 909, 928 (8th Cir. 2011) (it is claimant’s burden to establish RFC). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.