Robert Orlick v. Grand Forks Housing Authority
Opinion
Robert Orlick appeals after the district court 1 dismissed one of his pro se civil actions as barred by res judicata, and dismissed another of his pro se civil actions for failure to state a claim. He has filed an “emergency motion” on appeal. After careful de novo review, see Laase v. Cty. of Isanti, 638 F.3d 853, 856 (8th Cir. 2011); Levy v. Ohl, 477 F.3d 988, 991 (8th Cir. 2007), we conclude that Orlick’s complaints were properly dismissed for the reasons explained by the district court. Accord *219 ingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The pending motion is denied.
. The Honorable Alice R. Senechal, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of North Dakota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Robert W. ORLICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAND FORKS HOUSING AUTHORITY; Homestead Place, Inc.; Terry Hanson; Liz Simpson; Brad Hillebrand; Sherrie LeQuire; Nancy Brandner; Matt Martin, Defendants-Appellees, Robert W. Orlick, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mr. Warren Hanson, Defendant-Appellee
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Unpublished