United States v. Jason Delbosque
Opinion
Jason Delbosque directly appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pled guilty to knowingly transporting a minor in interstate' commerce with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that Delb-osque’s prison term is substantively unreasonable.
Upon review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc); see also 18 U.S.C. §§ 2423(a), 2260A. Having independently reviewed the record consistent with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we have found no non-frivolous issues. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment is affirmed.
. The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jason DELBOSQUE, Also Known as Jason Del Bosque, Defendant-Appellant
- Status
- Unpublished