Johnathan Moser directly appeals the sentence that the district court 1 imposed upon revoking his supervised release, arguing that the 18-month sentence, which is above the advisory Guidelines range, is substantively unreasonable. Upon careful review, see United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2009) [appellate *874 review of revocation sentence), we conclude that the revocation sentence is not unreasonable, as the district court gave sufficient reasons to support the sentence. See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 924 (8th Cir. 2006) (affirming statutory maximum revocation sentence where district court justified decision by giving supporting reasons). We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

The judgment is affirmed.