Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Dim Njaka v. Michael D. Kennedy

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Dim Njaka v. Michael D. Kennedy, 619 F. App'x 568 (8th Cir. 2015)
Wollman, Bye, Gruender

Dim Njaka v. Michael D. Kennedy

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dim Njaka appeals the district court’s 3 order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss his lawsuit under the Federal Employees’ Retirement System Act. Upon de novo review, see Hopkins v. City of Bloomington, 774 F.3d 490, 491-92 (8th Cir. 2014), we agree with the district court that *569 dismissal was proper. We deny as moot his challenge to the denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction. The judgment of the district court is áffírmed. 4 See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

3

.The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, now retired.

4

. We decline to address the new. matters and evidence Njaka offers on appeal. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004).

Reference

Full Case Name
Dim NJAKA, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Michael D. KENNEDY; Pamela-Jeanne Moran; Dana K. Bilyeu; Thomas K. Emswiler; Ronald D. McCray; David A. Jones; Terrence A. Duffy; Megan J. Brennan; Gregory T. Long; Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of Labor; Sharon Malmborg, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished
↑