Sherry McDaniel appeals after the district court 1 dismissed her Title VII com *315 plaint as barred by the statute of limitations. Upon de novo review, we conclude that the dismissal was proper, as McDaniel’s own filings showed that she brought her lawsuit more than ninety days after receiving a right-to-sue notice from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and tolling of the limitations period was not warranted. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) (setting forth 90-day limitations period); Richter v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc., 686 F.3d 847, 851 (8th Cir. 2012) (explaining application of statute of limitation); Garfield v. J.C. Nichols Real Estate, 57 F.3d 662, 666 (8th Cir. 1995) (discussing equitable tolling); see also Schaaf v. Residential Funding Corp., 517 F.3d 544, 549 (8th Cir. 2008) (de novo standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.