Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2016

Sherry McDaniel v. Kraft Global Foods

Sherry McDaniel v. Kraft Global Foods
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided February 1, 2016 · Wollman, Arnold, Smith
632 F. App'x 314

Counsel

Sherry McDaniel, Springfield, MO, pro se., Jonathan M. Linas, Jennifer W. Plag-man, Jones Day, Chicago, IL, Brian M. Jorgensen, Jones Day, Dallas, TX, for ap-pellee.

Sherry McDaniel v. Kraft Global Foods

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sherry McDaniel appeals after the district court 1 dismissed her Title VII com *315 plaint as barred by the statute of limitations. Upon de novo review, we conclude that the dismissal was proper, as McDaniel’s own filings showed that she brought her lawsuit more than ninety days after receiving a right-to-sue notice from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and tolling of the limitations period was not warranted. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) (setting forth 90-day limitations period); Richter v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc., 686 F.3d 847, 851 (8th Cir. 2012) (explaining application of statute of limitation); Garfield v. J.C. Nichols Real Estate, 57 F.3d 662, 666 (8th Cir. 1995) (discussing equitable tolling); see also Schaaf v. Residential Funding Corp., 517 F.3d 544, 549 (8th Cir. 2008) (de novo standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District *315 of Missouri.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.