United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-2629 ___________________________ PAULA FESENMEYER lllllllllllllllllllll PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. LAND BANK OF KC; KEVIN BERGMAN; THEODORE G.

RICHARDSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY; WILLIAM D. GEARY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY; CHAD STEWART, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY; TED ANDERSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY lllllllllllllllllllll DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES ____________ APPEAL FROM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI - KANSAS CITY ____________ SUBMITTED: April 4, 2016 FILED: April 8, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ BEFORE LOKEN, BYE, AND KELLY, CIRCUIT JUDGES. ____________ PER CURIAM.

PAULA FESENMEYER APPEALS AFTER THE DISTRICT COURT1 DISMISSED HER PRO SE ACTION UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), AS BARRED BY RES JUDICATA. IN HER BRIEF ON APPEAL, SHE CHALLENGES ONLY THE DISTRICT COURT’S DENIAL OF CERTAIN ACCOMMODATIONS.

UPON CAREFUL REVIEW, WE CONCLUDE THAT THE DISTRICT COURT APPROPRIATELY HANDLED FESENMEYER’S

THE HONORABLE STEPHEN R. BOUGH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. -2- VARIOUS REQUESTS FOR ACCOMMODATIONS. SEE 42 U.S.C. § 12131(1) (UNDER ADA, OMITTING FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FROM DEFINITION OF PUBLIC ENTITY); CF. TENNESSEE V. LANE, 541 U.S. 509, 522-23, 530-33 (2004) (DISCUSSING REASONABLE-ACCOMMODATION REQUIREMENTS UNDER ADA AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT). ACCORDINGLY, WE AFFIRM. SEE 8TH CIR. R. 47B. ALL PENDING MOTIONS ARE DENIED.

______________________________

-3-