Rena Kirk challenges the reasonableness of the sentence the district court 1 imposed upon revoking her supervised release. Upon careful review, we conclude that the revocation sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2009) (discussing appellate review of revocation sentence); see also United States v. Lazarski, 560 F.3d 731, 733 (8th Cir. 2009) (when court imposed below-Guidelines-range sentence, it was “nearly inconceivable” that court abused its discretion in not varying downward still further).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. We dlso grant counsel's motion for leave to withdraw.