Tracy Vaughn appeals after the district court 1 denied his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). After careful de novo review of the record, we find no reason to reverse the district court’s denial of Vaughn’s motion for a sentence reduction. See United States v. Logan, 710 F.3d 856, 857 (8th Cir. 2013) (appeals court reviews de novo district court’s determination that movant was not eligible for reduction under § 3582(c)(2)).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and Vaughn’s pro se objection to submission of this appeal without oral argument is denied.