United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 16-1301 ___________________________

Calvin Hammock

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

NASA Headquarters; Department of Defense; Space Exploration Technologies Space X; Apple; Blackberry (Curve) Corporation; Virgin Mobile; Mediacom WiFi; American Water Iowa; Unknown Defendants

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport ____________

Submitted: October 3, 2016 Filed: October 4, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM. Calvin Hammock appeals after the district court1 dismissed his pro se complaint. Upon careful review, we find no reason to reverse the dismissal order because, among other reasons, we agree with the district court that Hammock failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009); Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007); Kelly v. City of Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.

-2-