South Dakota inmate Rex Gard appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, we find no error in the district court’s thorough and well-reasoned analysis of Mr. Gard’s *434 claims. See Murchison v. Rogers, 779 F.3d 882, 886-87 (8th Cir. 2015) (viewing summary judgment record in light most favorable to non-movant, and drawing all reasonable inferences from it in his favor). We find no merit to Mr. Gard’s challenges to the other rulings he identifies. While we conclude that affirmance is warranted, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, we modify the district court’s judgment to reflect that the adverse- grant of summary judgment does not constitute a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).