Arron Lewis v. Charles Holladay
Arron Lewis v. Charles Holladay
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 16-2202 ___________________________
Arron Michael Lewis
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Charles Holladay, "Doc" Sheriff, Pulaski County Sheriff’s Department
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
Carl Johnson, M.D., Doctor, Pulaski County Jail
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant
Sarah Speer, Registered Nurse, Pulaski County Jail; Scott Hazel, Sergeant, Pulaski County Jail; Vanessa Lowe, Deputy, Transportation, Pulaski County Jail; Jacob Mitchell, Nurse, Medical Staff, Pulaski County Jail; Jeff Allison, Detective, Pulaski County Deputy; Jackson Bennett, Lieutenant, Pulaski County Deputy; Gary Seibel, Detective; Drew Evans, Detective, Pulaski County Jail; Jackman, Deputy, Transportation, Pulaski County Jail; Stuart, Sergeant, Pulaski County Jail; Elliott, Nurse, Intake/Booking, Pulaski County Jail; Kimberly Stowe, Nurse, Intake/Booking, Pulaski County Jail
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock ____________ Submitted: November 15, 2016 Filed: November 30, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Arron Michael Lewis appeals, following the entry of final judgment, the district court’s1 order granting summary judgment on certain claims in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We conclude that, for the reasons the district court stated, summary judgment was warranted. See Cullor v. Baldwin, 830 F.3d 830, 836 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review).2 The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 2 We decline to consider the new matters Lewis raises on appeal. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004).
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished