Jamie Jackson v. Carolyn W. Colvin

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jamie Jackson v. Carolyn W. Colvin, 671 F. App'x 395 (8th Cir. 2016)

Jamie Jackson v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jamie Lee Jackson appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the Commissioner’s determination, that she is not entitled to disability insurance benefits, after her hearing before an administrative law judge. Upon de novo review, see Perks v. Astrue, 687 F.3d 1086, 1091, 1093 (8th Cir. 2012), we are satisfied that the decision is supported by substantial evidence on the whole record. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jerome T. Kear-ney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Reference

Full Case Name
Jamie Lee JACKSON Plaintiff-Appellant v. Carolyn W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Defendant-Appellee
Status
Unpublished