David Jeep v. Government of the U.S.A.
David Jeep v. Government of the U.S.A.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 16-3221 ___________________________
David Gerard Jeep, and heir
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Government of the United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________
Submitted: October 31, 2016 Filed: December 22, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________
Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
David Jeep filed a notice of appeal while this action was pending. After careful review, we dismiss the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction because Jeep’s notice of appeal did not designate the order, judgment, or part thereof that he was appealing. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(B) (notice of appeal must designate judgment, order, or part thereof being appealed); Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244, 248 (1992) (Rule 3 requirements are jurisdictional). We also deny as moot Jeep’s pending motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished